When "Proof in Textbook" Isn't Obvious: The Physics/Math Meme
This meme humorously depicts the common academic frustration of a professor stating "The proof is in the textbook," only for the textbook's explanation to be incredibly complex and far from "obvious." It features advanced mathematical/physics notation related to spinors and group theory (SO(10), SU(5), etc.), highlighting the intimidating nature of higher-level proofs.

A meme with black text on a white background. The top text reads: "Professor: 'The proof is in the textbook.' The textbook:". Below this, there is a section of what appears to be a highly technical physics or mathematics textbook page. It starts with "For SO(10), show that a 32 dimensional spinor ∣ψ⟩ can be decomposed as:", followed by a complex equation involving ∣ψ⟩, ψ  0 ​	  , a  i † ​	  , ψ  i ​	  , ϵ  ijklm  , a  k † ​	  a  l † ​	  a  m † ​	  , and more, labeled as (18.75). The text continues: "where ψ  ij ​	   is antisymmetric. Show that these form the SU(5) representations of 1, 5, 10, and their conjugates. Show that this generates the irreducible 16-dimensional spinor and its conjugate. Now generalize your results for SU(n) and SO(2n), decomposing a SO(2n) spinor into SU(n) multiplets." Finally, at the very bottom, in bold, it states: "PROOF. Obvious." followed by an empty checkbox.

 

This meme perfectly encapsulates a shared moment of dread and humor for many students in advanced mathematics or theoretical physics. The setup is simple: a professor casually states, "The proof is in the textbook," implying a straightforward explanation.

 

However, the "textbook" section presented below is anything but. It dives immediately into highly complex notation involving a 32-dimensional spinor, its decomposition, and concepts from group theory like SO(10)SU(5), and their representations.

 

The lengthy equation, coupled with instructions to generalize results for SU(n)and SO(2n), is intimidating. The punchline, "PROOF. Obvious.", delivered after such an intricate problem, is the core of the humor.

 

It highlights the vast gap between a professor's understanding and a student's struggle, making light of how seemingly "obvious" concepts in advanced fields can be incredibly challenging for learners. It's a relatable jab at the often terse and unhelpful explanations found in dense academic texts, resonating with anyone who's faced a daunting mathematical proof.

admin
Official Verified Account

just Admin

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://yipzap.com/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!

Facebook Conversations

Disqus Conversations