There was a rather strange incident in a highly-publicized rapid game between Hikaru Nakamura and Magnus Carlsen. Nakamura who had the white pieces had what future analysis indicated was a winning position. And in spite of having a winning position, Nakamura resigned. This is rather bizarre for a player of Nakamura's level to resign a game while having an advantage, if not a winning position. It generated a lot of discussion and analysis within the chess community.
Understanding the Magnus Effect
This strange resignation can be partially understood with an issue called the Magnus Effect. The Magnus effect defines the psychological influence that Magnus Carlsen has on many opponents, which causes them to play below their capability, to make irrational blunders, or to miscalculate the position. There are several factors that contribute to creating the Magnus Effect, including:
Carlsen's title: Carlsen has held the world championship title for so long and has attained one of the highest ratings in chess history can be psychologically intimidating;
Pressure induction: Carlsen has been known to show up at the players' tournament round of play and play before the round, sometimes adding to their mental duress. This can develop a larger need for perfection or definitive continuations just to play competitively against Carlsen. Players can have a greater awareness of Carlsen's ability come back from difficult positions (or punish sloppy play), even in blitz.
Psychological Warfare: Carlsen's hallmark characteristic is unyielding strength and resilience and also the desire to present practical tasks to opponents which induce them to doubt their own judgment, even if they are, objectively, better. They may think that there were no threats which were not there, or they can't see their own strengths, perhaps because of the complex position Carlsen had invoked.
Regarding Nakamura's resignation, the Magnus Effect is a reasonable assumption to consider. Under the duress of a rapid time format against a formidable opponent, Nakamura may have misevaluated the objects, believed he had more of an advantage than he did, or became preoccupied with a possible tactic generated from nothing by Carlsen, etc... and conceded too early.
Hikaru Nakamura: The matter of emotions, including important performance factors
Also, to be explicit, we have noted that Hikaru Nakamura shows visible emotions during games, and more frequently during live-streamed competitions. When Hikaru makes a mistake or feels like he made a mistake, he often shows visible frustrations and will give himself at least verbal criticism immediately, even during the game when a significant amount of "play" remains to be played, and game outcome is uncertain.
This tendency to show emotional affects during the act of competitive play has led to some conjecturing about whether it is affecting Nakamura's consistency and performance during but in particular in the past few years in rapid or blitz games. For now Nakamura remains as one of the best players in the world but this can certainly affect a player's focus and reasoning ability. When a player audibly or physically shows they are upset by a mistake that can lead to a feedback loop of unaffect affect which can prompt it to be more unlikely that the player will regain their composure and see the next best move in the game.
It is possible that if an emotional state was experienced by the player, they will be less resilient against psychological pressures a player might experience, including the Magnus effect. If you are playing someone known for only winning after they notice you have made a mistake maintaining an emotional "control" state cannot be overstated. If a player is already feeling the affect from the strain of having made a mistake when they begin playing and get to play someone like Carlsen! This added pressure can and might prompt further mistakes as would in any psychology application, and it is not inconceivable that it could lead to strange mistakes like resigning when you should win.
In conclusion, Hikaru Nakamura resigning in a winning position against Magnus Carlsen can be related, in part, to the psychology of the "Magnus Effect." Further, a player's customary emotional states while competing also lend insight into how mental variables factor into decision-making and overall performance, even among el
ite-level chess players.
Credits to Chess.com for the pictures that was included in this article
Comments
0 comment